![]() Of course, if you want Free… you don't have much choice. But it's probably because I'm used to it. Some things you cannot do and I believe LB has better "file" management. Has less features than LB at the moment and is somewhat slower in certain things. Can't recall now an example but I remember smiling at certain details.Ĭons of Alfred? If the features you want are not in the free package, you will have to pay. Some actions are better implemented than LB. You can change more things and it's more prone to be configurable in the future. Pros of Alfred? It's free for basic stuff, works ok and has a nice community. Not that it really "needs" more, but… new ideas would be welcomed too. ![]() Other than the ocasional bug-fix, the program hasn't really been updated in a few months. Relatively easy to configure and expand (e.g.: to add a search and/or modify the catalog).Ĭons of LB? Development is not what you'd call a fast thing. Also there is a 3rd party integration of Launchbar with Devonthink. Pros of LB? It's stable, been working for years and it delivers. I have used Alfred for quite some time but I learned recently about the Instant Send feature of Launchbar which seems very nice. Clearly the power pack brings it to the level of LB. It lacks certain things (I didn't have the powerpack). Hit a keyboard shortcut to open the launchbar, search for what you want, and hit return. Launcher apps help you do stuff on your Mac really quickly, without taking your hands off the keyboard. Perhaps not as "open" as quicksilver but very mature and stable.Īlfred (which is newer) is ok and it delivers (been using it for a couple of weeks). LaunchBar vs Alfred vs Quicksilver vs FastFolderFinder compared. Truth is, Launchbar ends up being a perfect replacement for most tasks. Right after the switch (I used QS too), I missed a few things here and there and had to adjust to others. In my experience, LaunchBar (which I'm using now) has been the best replacement for QuickSilver. In your answer, please do let me know about the features of your suggested application, and note if there are any missing features from my desired “ wish list”. A healthy community of developers actively maintaining the application. ![]() I would love if it could index, e.g., my delicious bookmarks. Able to perform actions or operations on files (copy, move, reveal in Finder).Web search, and search within bookmarks of my favorite browser.Launching applications, preference panels and apple scripts. ![]() So my question is, as of today, which would be the best replacement for QuickSilver? Ideally I would like support for the following features: I'm aware of a few alternatives out there, notably AlfredApp and LaunchBar, but I wanted to ask here for your opinion and recommendations before trying them out. But then again, development seems to have stopped and several features I still miss (like AppleScript launching) were never properly implemented. I then moved to QSB, which seemed to be where the efforts were being concentrated in order to produce such an application. But then development of the application seemed to have stagnated for a while, and many bugs (specially with plugins and advanced features) were never fixed. I'm an avid fan of QuickSilver, and I had been using it for several years already. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |